How has belief modality contributed to formal semantics?
نویسنده
چکیده
Looking back the history of formal treatment of linguistics, we cannot disregard the contribution of possible world semantics. Intensional logic of Montague semantics, DRT (Discourse Representation Theory), mental space, and situation theory are closely related to or compared with the notion of possible world. All these theories have commonly clarified the structure of belief context or uncertain knowledge, employing hypothesized worlds. In this talk, I firstly brief the pedigree of these theories. Next, I will introduce the recent development of modal logic for the representation of (i) knowledge and belief and (ii) time, in which belief modality is precisely discussed together with the accessibility among possible worlds. I will refer to BDI (belief-desire-intention) logic, CTL (computational tree logic), and sphere-based model in belief revision. Finally, I will discuss how these theories could be applied to the further development of analyses of natural language.
منابع مشابه
A model for updates in a multi-agent setting
This paper deals with the problem of how to represent changes in belief when several agents are witnesses to some event in the world and they are witnesses to the event in such a manner that it is common knowledge that they have all witnessed it. The problem is closely analogous to the problem of how to represent changes in belief when common announcements are made, announcements where it becom...
متن کاملArgument-based Belief in Topological Structures
This paper combines two studies: a topological semantics for epistemic notions and abstract argumentation theory. In our combined setting, we use a topological semantics to represent the structure of an agent’s collection of evidence, and we use argumentation theory to single out the relevant sets of evidence through which a notion of beliefs grounded on arguments is defined. We discuss the for...
متن کاملEvidence Logic: A New Look at Neighborhood Structures
Two of the authors (van Benthem and Pacuit) recently introduced evidence logic as a way to model epistemic agents faced with possibly contradictory evidence from different sources. For this the authors used neighborhood semantics, where a neighborhood N indicates that the agent has reason to believe that the true state of the world lies in N . A normal belief modality is defined in terms of the...
متن کاملA Discourse Analysis of “The Prince and His Companions” in Kelileh and Demneh Based On Semio-Semantics
Despite showing an overtly simple structure, the semantic process in classic literary-narrative discourse conforms to complicated semiotic systems. As a result, semio-semantics is deemed as one of the most scientific, reliable tools since it helps intradiscursive semio-textual propositions be phenomenologically, and even epistemologically, analyzed. Consequently, the narrative discourse in “The...
متن کاملBisimulation and expressivity for conditional belief, degrees of belief, and safe belief
Plausibility models are Kripke models that agents use to reason about knowledge and belief, both of themselves and of each other. Such models are used to interpret the notions of conditional belief, degrees of belief, and safe belief. The logic of conditional belief contains that modality and also the knowledge modality, and similarly for the logic of degrees of belief and the logic of safe bel...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007